Enter a word or phrase in any language 👆
Language:
Translation and analysis of words by ChatGPT artificial intelligence
On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:
- how the word is used
- frequency of use
- it is used more often in oral or written speech
- word translation options
- usage examples (several phrases with translation)
- etymology
What (who) is heterological paradox - definition
SELF-REFERENTIAL PARADOX: IS THE WORD “HETEROLOGICAL” (DEFINED AS REFERRING TO A WORD THAT DOES NOT DESCRIBE ITSELF) HETEROLOGICAL?
Weyl's paradox; Weyl's Paradox; Blardy; Grelling's paradox; Grelling paradox; Grellings paradox; Weyl paradox; Grelling-Nelson paradox; Heterological predicate
Grelling–Nelson paradox
The Grelling–Nelson paradox is an antinomy, or a semantic self-referential paradox, concerning the applicability to itself of the word "[meaning "inapplicable to itself". It was formulated in 1908 by Kurt Grelling] and [[Leonard Nelson, and is sometimes mistakenly attributed to the German philosopher and mathematician Hermann Weyl.
D'Alembert's paradox
![wake]],<br>
•5: post-critical separated flow, with a turbulent boundary layer.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Drag coefficient on a sphere vs. Reynolds number - main trends.svg?width=200 "wake]],<br>
•5: post-critical separated flow, with a turbulent boundary layer.")
![Pressure distribution for the flow around a circular cylinder. The dashed blue line is the pressure distribution according to [[potential flow]] theory, resulting in d'Alembert's paradox. The solid blue line is the mean pressure distribution as found in experiments at high [[Reynolds number]]s. The pressure is the radial distance from the cylinder surface; a positive pressure (overpressure) is inside the cylinder, towards the centre, while a negative pressure (underpressure) is drawn outside the cylinder.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Flow pressure with friction.svg?width=200 "Pressure distribution for the flow around a circular cylinder. The dashed blue line is the pressure distribution according to [[potential flow]] theory, resulting in d'Alembert's paradox. The solid blue line is the mean pressure distribution as found in experiments at high [[Reynolds number]]s. The pressure is the radial distance from the cylinder surface; a positive pressure (overpressure) is inside the cylinder, towards the centre, while a negative pressure (underpressure) is drawn outside the cylinder.")
![circular]] cylinder in a uniform onflow.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Potential cylinder.svg?width=200 "circular]] cylinder in a uniform onflow.")
THE THEOREM THAT, FOR INCOMPRESSIBLE AND INVISCID POTENTIAL FLOW, THE DRAG FORCE IS 0 ON A BODY MOVING WITH CONSTANT VELOCITY RELATIVE TO THE FLUID, IN CONTRADICTION TO REAL LIFE, WHERE VISCOSITY CAUSES SUBSTANTIAL DRAG, ESPECIALLY AT HIGH VELOCITIES
D'Alembert's Paradox; D'Alembert paradox; Hydrodynamic paradox; D'Alembert Paradox; D'Alemberts Paradox; D'Alemberts' Paradox; Dalembert's Paradox; Hydrodynamical paradox; Hydrodynamics paradox; D'alembert's Paradox
In fluid dynamics, d'Alembert's paradox (or the hydrodynamic paradox) is a contradiction reached in 1752 by French mathematician Jean le Rond d'Alembert.Jean le Rond d'Alembert (1752).
Paradox (literature)
LITERARY DEVICE; ANOMALOUS JUXTAPOSITION OF INCONGRUOUS IDEAS FOR THE SAKE OF STRIKING EXPOSITION OR UNEXPECTED INSIGHT
Paradox of poetry; Literary paradox
In literature, the paradox is an anomalous juxtaposition of incongruous ideas for the sake of striking exposition or unexpected insight. It functions as a method of literary composition and analysis that involves examining apparently contradictory statements and drawing conclusions either to reconcile them or to explain their presence.
Wikipedia
Grelling–Nelson paradox
The Grelling–Nelson paradox is an antinomy, or a semantic self-referential paradox, concerning the applicability to itself of the word "heterological", meaning "inapplicable to itself". It was formulated in 1908 by Kurt Grelling and Leonard Nelson, and is sometimes mistakenly attributed to the German philosopher and mathematician Hermann Weyl. It is thus occasionally called Weyl's paradox and Grelling's paradox. It is closely related to several other well-known paradoxes, in particular, the barber paradox and Russell's paradox.
